jump to navigation

Guns & Roses – Part 1 July 25, 2008

Posted by Sneh in Government, Gujarat, India, Society.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
trackback

 

Guns – Memo No. 1

Wednesday, 16th July: A pleasant morning and I am on my way to work. I had a repellent experience with one of the traffic officials. I made out my way from behind the Income-Tax underpass and approached to the Stadium five roads to head to C G Road. Seeing that the signal just hit red, I opted to take left and then ‘U’ turn for C G Road. No wrong side driving, No prohibition sign for U turn, No lane breaking – I just continued to my destination in a bit unconventional fashion. At the next junction, I had someone honking vigorously at my back. “Who’s this daft spoiling this pleasant morning ride?” I thought.

Honking is the religious right of each driver in Ahmedabad. As soon as the traffic signal goes green, a car which is 4th in the queue will start honking as the drivers at the front are sleeping, as they enjoy not moving from the front. Again, it’s a matter of civilian discipline and this is not just lack, but absolute absence of patience. I believe we may not be able to adhere to the western protocol of not honking at all. In England, heads turn around if anyone listens to a little ‘pom pom’ from a driver. But we cannot stop using, because there are hundreds of sleep walkers on roads who need a wake up call even in a busiest traffic flow. But we can discipline our senses to resist our ringing thumbs. A good point triggered in between! But let me take you back to that honk at my back.

Suddenly, a white 180cc traffic horse appeared and nailed me to the corner. “License aapo, tame ‘U’ turn laine bhagya chho!” (Show me the license; you took ‘U’ turn to run away).

 

'U' turn

'U' turn

Taking you turn at the front-end of the divider is of course not allowed but going back to the rear end to take a ‘U’ turn could not be a punishable act. Under Motor Vehicle Act 119/177, changing the lane without indication or violation of yellow line is punishable. I don’t think I could be framed in any of these. Believing this, I argued a little, traffic cop started wasting minutes, took my license and went away to manage the traffic. He could understand I am on my way to work and getting late. Considering the responsibility to reach office on time, I forcibly accepted my act as sinful rather than just unconventional, which I still believe. I agreed to pay the fine and he started writing the memo. Here’s the memo, which I received from the cop.

 

 

 

 

Now, let’s see how he messed up with the memo!

Take a look at no. 1 in the memo. Initially when he made this memo and gave this to me, I found he did not mention the type of violation I made under the act 119,177. He just mentioned “under act 119,177” which is having 10 types of violations like breaking signal, stop line, one-way entry etc. This suggests, he did not want to mention the violation as he knew I could not be punished for a ‘U’ turn violation of traffic rules. I insisted on writing the type of the violation and he did write but it didn’t carbon copy in his book anyway.

No. 2, it was a bizarre feeling when I came to know what he mentioned as him name in the memo. I felt cheated seeing that he mentioned his name as “C. H. Sharma” in the memo and also signed as “C. H. Sharma”. His name plate clearly suggested his surname was Pandey. I cannot recall the initials but I perfectly remember the last name. So, there were more than one attempt to leave no evidence from which I can even appeal to prove that I did not break the law. Even now, I do not claim that I did not make any mistake but when I am having doubts I can even appeal for that as I cannot prove who actually made the memo.

As the matter of fact, we do not take such small things acutely. But the substance of integrity within many governing bodies is missing. One more encouraging reason for not arguing much to the cop was to consider him as one of the traffic men who have to face the hard sun for hours, who have to control menacing drivers, who are being abused verbally every now and then and who sometimes even get assaulted physically. All these reasons are good enough to have a little apathy towards them and an element of cooperation by abiding to the traffic rules reasonably if not completely. Let me also clear my prime intent for sharing this particular issue, that we should remain alert when we are cornered by traffic police. We should understand the act violation, confirm the amount of fine written at the back of the slip and we should always confirm the details being filled in such memos. ‘Guns’ is just a title and it only means that we keep our senses open while dealing with such individuals. “Jankari Janhit Me Jari!!!”

Related Articles:
Guns & Roses – Part 2: Roses for Immobilized Khaki
Guns & Roses – In Continuation: Where to Look? Inside Us!

Comments»

1. Rakhee Patel - August 27, 2008

Absolutely brilliant explanation, i am really impressed. And i honestly appreciate your patience.

2. Develover - September 21, 2008

Good job dear…
I am also feeling that, traffic police are not doing their job in such a manner at that time an alone person also being helpless.